According to a survey by ECA International Suzhou has been ranked as the 20th most costly Asian city for expats to live in.
The list; which puts Suzhou slightly ahead of Xi’An, Wuhan and Nanjing and behind Dalian, Chengdu and Chongqing; lists both Beijing and Shanghai in the top 10 (#7 and #8 respectively).
A lot of friends of mine in China, but outside of Suzhou, are often a bit surprised when I tell them that Suzhou’s got a large expat population. I think because Lonely Planet (erm, rather Rough Guides, now that LP is banned) tends to paint Suzhou as a quaint day-trip from Shanghai, people tend to assume that no one would come and live here.
In fact, Suzhou’s expat population is massive, and concentrated. For a city that is, by Chinese standards, quite small, there is a large number of expats. And, as they’re mostly concentrated to the very Western-esque Suzhou/Singapore Industrial Park (SIP), where prices continue to skyrocket, it’s little wonder why Suzhou made the list.
H/T to Shanghaiist for bringing the survey to my attention. Kenneth Tan makes an excellent point in the article that really… these lists are all bunk anyways:
IMHO, all these “costliest” rankings and “quality of life” rankings are becoming increasingly irrelevant in the new world. Jaded expats like ourselves (and we aren’t even strictly speaking an “expatriate”, more like a “half-pat”) now know better that it isn’t going to get more or less costly for ourselves just because these guys tell us so. One man’s meat is another man’s poison, and we’re all living different lifestyles, so really, one-size-fits-all rankings just don’t cut it anymore. Do these consultants know it? Sure they do. But we doubt anything’s going to stop them from spending more man-hours and money every few months coming up with a different ranking to make it to the news (and blogs like this one). Sigh.
Here’s the complete list anyway:
Asia 2007 |
City |
Country |
World 2007 |
1 |
Seoul |
KOREA REPUBLIC |
7 |
2 |
Tokyo |
JAPAN |
13 |
3 |
Yokohama |
JAPAN |
18 |
4 |
Kobe |
JAPAN |
27 |
5 |
Hong Kong |
HONG KONG [sic] |
79 |
6 |
Taipei |
TAIWAN [sic] |
94 |
7 |
Beijing |
CHINA |
95 |
8 |
Shanghai |
CHINA |
100 |
9 |
Singapore |
SINGAPORE |
122 |
10 |
Guangzhou |
CHINA |
147 |
11 |
Jakarta |
INDONESIA |
153 |
12 |
Shenzhen |
CHINA |
156 |
13 |
Shenyang |
CHINA |
158 |
14 |
Qingdao |
CHINA |
159 |
15 |
Tianjin |
CHINA |
160 |
16 |
Dalian |
CHINA |
162 |
17 |
Chongqing |
CHINA |
166 |
18 |
Bangkok |
THAILAND |
168 |
19 |
Chengdu |
CHINA |
169 |
20 |
Suzhou |
CHINA |
171 |
21 |
Xi’an |
CHINA |
172 |
22 |
Wuhan |
CHINA |
175 |
23 |
Nanjing |
CHINA |
176 |
24 |
Mumbai |
INDIA |
177 |
25 |
New Delhi |
INDIA |
178 |
26 |
Xiamen |
CHINA |
182 |
27 |
Chennai |
INDIA |
186 |
28 |
Hyderabad |
INDIA |
189 |
29 |
Metro-Manila |
PHILIPPINES |
191 |
30 |
Kolkata |
INDIA |
193 |
31 |
Pune |
INDIA |
214 |
32 |
Hanoi |
VIETNAM |
195 |
33 |
Kuala Lumpur |
MALAYSIA |
197 |
34 |
Vientiane |
LAOS |
198 |
35 |
Karachi |
PAKISTAN |
203 |
36 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
VIETNAM |
204 |
37 |
Bangalore |
INDIA |
205 |
38 |
Colombo |
SRI LANKA |
212 |
39 |
Islamabad |
PAKISTAN |
213 |